Subtitle: You, Too, ‘Merika
Speaking of a Congress cursed by future generations, it always is refreshing to witness rare truth-telling. In this case, from a Senator no less. Wonkroom Brad Johnson quotes Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT): “I do not want to see a Global Warming bill become a bonanza for the Coal Industry.”

It’s beautiful. You always look beautiful.
Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) have crafted a new Senate climate bill. Sanders expressed “deep disappointment” with the direction the climate legislation is heading. In a letter to Kerry, the Vermont independent praised Kerry’s “continued leadership” as a “tireless advocate for taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions” yet expressed serious concerns.
Brad Johnson summarizes them:
– Support for New Nuclear Power: “If the private sector will not finance new nuclear plants, the government should not risk taxpayer dollars by stepping in.”
– Offshore Drilling: “We should not, in a global warming bill, support increased offshore drilling.”
– Coal Plant Emissions: “Global warming legislation should move us forward by requiring coal plants to meet increasingly stringent pollution standards. It should not take us backwards by exempting coal plants from this kind of regulation by grandfathering in the dirtiest plants so they can continue to operate for years to come.”
Ten other senators have challenged new support for offshore drilling in the bill. Sanders also called for several green economy initiatives to be in the legislation, including green jobs and energy efficiency funding that was included in the Kerry-Boxer climate bill that passed out of the Senate environment committee last December. That legislation limited EPA and state authority to set rules for global warming pollution, but it appears that Kerry-Graham-Lieberman could go even farther to preempt existing law with a new framework, leading Sanders to warn, “I do not want to see a global warming bill become a bonanza for the coal industry.”
Sanders’ concerns mirror those of Mike Brune, the new executive director of the Sierra Club, who told The Hill:
We will go to the mat for defending Clean Air Act authority. We are also concerned about offshore oil drilling, and we will not be able to accept the dramatic giveaway that offshore oil drilling represents.
Climate legislation will, by discouraging global warming pollution, support existing low-carbon energy technologies like renewables, natural gas, and nuclear power, and will also create a market for advanced coal technology. The coal, gas, and nuclear industries certainly do not need an additional layer of taxpayer subsidies to thrive in a low-carbon future. However, they have the resources to make clean energy reform an arduous process unless their demands are met, especially if, as Mother Jones’ Kate Sheppard argues, Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman are “neglecting the Senate’s environmental champions.”

Kerry-Graham-Lieberman will introduce their climate legislation the week of Earth Day, ironic, eh?
As this blog morosely observed before, such climate legislation does have a bright side; it makes the banking rip-off and war profiteering positively saintly in comparison. A Wonkroom commentator, in an effort to diminish Sanders letter’s significance, attributed it to left wing politics. As if desiring to save Life on the Planet as we know it is an exceptional case, and that the ear-tagged ignoring their official responsibility to respond to degradation of the atmosphere brought about by anthropogenic emissions is not malefic.
After Gutenberg readers shake their heads sadly– yes, coal won the 2008 election. Such friends in rich places behavior continues despite repeated warnings. Politics As Usual. Did the scorpion and frog ever reach the other side of the river?



3 Comments
O.K. Got those eyes wide shut? Ear plugs? You know where to put the cork… On with the show, Washington Theater Proudly Presents:
One more video, where Kerry speaks about political tactics: Politico
And, a wave of the channel zapper toward Matthew McDermott
Salon has an article by William Astore looking at the state of play in American politics – “The business of America is kleptocracy.”
Which is similar to my reply to Brian Merchant’s rhetorical question, How much compromise would make the climate bill worthless?
Senator Bernie sez, “Let’s set the record straight:”
4 Trackbacks
[...] more severe about such wicked disregard for future survival of life on the planet as we know it, our ear-tagged Congress critters will pass some version of the continuing, clean coal [...]
[...] tipping point and the impact upon fisheries, climate legislation up for consideration by the Senate caters to the coal industry and protects our increasingly heavy carbon [...]
[...] this blog observed that we should expect our ear-tagged Congress critters will pass some version of the continuing, clean coal [...]
[...] “As long as state-level policies are boosted instead of pre-empted.” And, here this blog thought that the purpose of the energy security bill was to hamstring the EPA and cater further to their [...]