So Close Your Eyes, Bernie

Subtitle: You, Too, ‘Merika

Speaking of a Congress cursed by future generations, it always is refreshing to witness rare truth-telling. In this case, from a Senator no less. Wonkroom Brad Johnson quotes Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT): “I do not want to see a Global Warming bill become a bonanza for the Coal Industry.”

Eye Wide Shut
It’s beautiful. You always look beautiful.

Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) with Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) have crafted a new Senate climate bill. Sanders expressed “deep disappointment” with the direction the climate legislation is heading. In a letter to Kerry, the Vermont independent praised Kerry’s “continued leadership” as a “tireless advocate for taking action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions” yet expressed serious concerns.

Brad Johnson summarizes them:

Support for New Nuclear Power: “If the private sector will not finance new nuclear plants, the government should not risk taxpayer dollars by stepping in.”

Offshore Drilling: “We should not, in a global warming bill, support increased offshore drilling.”

Coal Plant Emissions: “Global warming legislation should move us forward by requiring coal plants to meet increasingly stringent pollution standards. It should not take us backwards by exempting coal plants from this kind of regulation by grandfathering in the dirtiest plants so they can continue to operate for years to come.”

Ten other senators have challenged new support for offshore drilling in the bill. Sanders also called for several green economy initiatives to be in the legislation, including green jobs and energy efficiency funding that was included in the Kerry-Boxer climate bill that passed out of the Senate environment committee last December. That legislation limited EPA and state authority to set rules for global warming pollution, but it appears that Kerry-Graham-Lieberman could go even farther to preempt existing law with a new framework, leading Sanders to warn, “I do not want to see a global warming bill become a bonanza for the coal industry.”

Sanders’ concerns mirror those of Mike Brune, the new executive director of the Sierra Club, who told The Hill:

We will go to the mat for defending Clean Air Act authority. We are also concerned about offshore oil drilling, and we will not be able to accept the dramatic giveaway that offshore oil drilling represents.

Climate legislation will, by discouraging global warming pollution, support existing low-carbon energy technologies like renewables, natural gas, and nuclear power, and will also create a market for advanced coal technology. The coal, gas, and nuclear industries certainly do not need an additional layer of taxpayer subsidies to thrive in a low-carbon future. However, they have the resources to make clean energy reform an arduous process unless their demands are met, especially if, as Mother Jones’ Kate Sheppard argues, Kerry, Graham, and Lieberman are “neglecting the Senate’s environmental champions.”

Earth Day 2010
Kerry-Graham-Lieberman will introduce their climate legislation the week of Earth Day, ironic, eh?

As this blog morosely observed before, such climate legislation does have a bright side; it makes the banking rip-off and war profiteering positively saintly in comparison. A Wonkroom commentator, in an effort to diminish Sanders letter’s significance, attributed it to left wing politics. As if desiring to save Life on the Planet as we know it is an exceptional case, and that the ear-tagged ignoring their official responsibility to respond to degradation of the atmosphere brought about by anthropogenic emissions is not malefic.

After Gutenberg readers shake their heads sadly– yes, coal won the 2008 election. Such friends in rich places behavior continues despite repeated warnings. Politics As Usual. Did the scorpion and frog ever reach the other side of the river?

Other Possibly Related AG Posts Automatically Generated

3 Comments

  1. jcwinnie
    Posted 2010-4-19 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    O.K. Got those eyes wide shut? Ear plugs? You know where to put the cork… On with the show, Washington Theater Proudly Presents:

    One more video, where Kerry speaks about political tactics: Politico

    And, a wave of the channel zapper toward Matthew McDermott

  2. jcwinnie
    Posted 2010-4-21 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    Salon has an article by William Astore looking at the state of play in American politics – “The business of America is kleptocracy.”

    Which is similar to my reply to Brian Merchant’s rhetorical question, How much compromise would make the climate bill worthless?

    Bri, Bri, Bri, it is not a question of worth. Some friends of the Chooster will make out like bandits with the Clean Coal scam. The question we need to ask is how much harm the ear-tagged Congress critters are going to accomplish with Kerry-Lieberman-Graham.

  3. jcwinnie
    Posted 2010-4-21 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    Senator Bernie sez, “Let’s set the record straight:”

    There is no serious dispute within the scientific community and in peer-reviewed journals that global warming is real and that it is significantly caused by anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Virtually the only people who disagree with this conclusion are representatives of the oil and coal companies, their apologists in the media and those on Capitol Hill who are stubborn defenders of their big polluter patrons.

    As Congress debates global warming, it reminds me of those congressional hearings where tobacco company executives swore under oath that the nicotine they put in cigarettes was not addictive. Some people in Congress believed them. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence, the wealthy and powerful tobacco lobby had many allies in Congress toeing the company line.

    Like the evidence that tobacco kills, the science on global warming is overwhelming. NASA just reported that the decade from 2000-2009 was the warmest on record. Carbon dioxide levels are increasing because we are burning fossil fuels and cutting down forests at a rate that is unsustainable. How do we know that carbon dioxide pollution causes global warming? Among the researchers who reached that conclusion are scientists at NASA, EPA, The National Science Foundation, and the departments of Energy, Commerce, Defense, Interior, State, Health, Transportation, and Agriculture. They say, through the U.S. Global Change Research Program, that “global warming is unequivocal and primarily human-induced.” The CIA and many military leaders have warned that climate change threatens our national security and international stability.

    If anything, we have underestimated the problem. Our own National Academies of Science released findings last year that “climate change is happening even faster than previously estimated” and “the need for urgent action to address climate change is now indisputable.” U.S. average temperatures have already increased by 2 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 50 years, and a Massachusetts Institute of Technology report found a very high probability that unless we act now temperatures could rise by 9 degrees Fahrenheit by the end of this century. That would be catastrophic.

    We already have seen sea levels rise by as much as nine inches in some areas. As ice sheets and glaciers continue to melt, rising sea levels will put coastal cities at risk of increased flooding and island nations in danger of being submerged. Our top U.S. scientists tell us that unchecked global warming also means increased risks of regional flooding and drought, increased risk to human health and more extreme weather events.

    Despite the scientific evidence, some of my colleagues in Congress still tell the public that global warming is a “hoax.” They recently grasped onto a series of stolen e-mails from a few climate scientists, which they say undermines the science. Well, according to exhaustive reviews throughout the world, the e-mails do no such thing.

    The truth is that there is a real global warming scandal, but it has nothing to do with the e-mails of a few scientists. The real scandal is that the oil companies and the coal industry and others with an economic stake in the status quo are using the tobacco-industry playbook to confuse the public and prevent Congress from taking strong action. Exxon-Mobil, for example, has spent more than $24 million since 1998 to fund organizations that are willing to dispute the consensus on global warming. Oil and gas companies spent $154 million lobbying Congress in 2009 alone trying to block legislation to move our county away from fossil fuels and toward sustainable energy.

    As we celebrate this Earth Day, we can make this the year when we stop arguing about the science, and start doing something truly significant about global warming. That would make 2010 a year to celebrate for generations to come.

4 Trackbacks

  1. [...] more severe about such wicked disregard for future survival of life on the planet as we know it, our ear-tagged Congress critters will pass some version of the continuing, clean coal [...]

  2. [...] tipping point and the impact upon fisheries, climate legislation up for consideration by the Senate caters to the coal industry and protects our increasingly heavy carbon [...]

  3. [...] this blog observed that we should expect our ear-tagged Congress critters will pass some version of the continuing, clean coal [...]

  4. By Full Policy with Cap – After Gutenberg on 2010-4-28 at 8:28 am

    [...] “As long as state-level policies are boosted instead of pre-empted.” And, here this blog thought that the purpose of the energy security bill was to hamstring the EPA and cater further to their [...]

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE