I’ll try to contain my excitement

Full Disclosure: This blog lives over a part of the Marcellus Shale Appalachian Basin. While the energy companies have yet begun to drill in my backyard, nearby (about 10-15 miles away) they have been drilling for shale gas. Recently, there was news that my Pennsylvanian neighbors are concerned about fracking fluid found in their water supplies. Also on the scanner from the HuffPo News Team, there was concern expressed in my state, New York, about what to do with the radioactivity they find in what comes from drilling.

O.K.? So on with news of a “Very exciting day here in Beijing. There’s enormous interest in both governments working together to fight climate change. The package announced today is far-reaching and can make a real difference in cutting emissions.”

Obama in China
In Beijing a comprehensive plan for U.S.-China cooperation on clean energy and climate change has been announced by President Barack Obama and President Hu Jintao.

Climate Progress relays word of the joint U.S. and China announcement of a “positive, cooperative and comprehensive” plan for collaboration on clean energy and climate change.

Climate Progress also tries a positive spin on “shale gas, which appears to exist in abundance in China and could allow re-powering of existing Chinese coal plants and more rapid medium-term reductions than people have thought possible.”

CP commentator Canada Guy reflects my sentiments: “This doesn’t look very encouraging. Lots of measuring and planning, and lots of focus on coal and shale. There is no clean coal, it is a fairy tale. Where are the actual *cuts* in emissions?”

Well, no cuts in emissions promised from the 2 biggest emitters, rather some efforts at cooperation in the following areas: GHG monitoring, joint research, China has EVs to sell US, Energy Efficiency*, Renewable Energy*, further perpetuating the Clean Coal lie, drilling for shale gas, more Nuclear Power, public-private partnerships*.

* Note: Energy.gov provides fact sheets. Still it might be wise to have your decoder rings handy.

World Map of Dirtiest Power Plants
From information about 200 of the World’s Dirtiest Power Plants, one can see why the United States and China are the two largest greenhouse gas emitters in the world; 60% of the dirtiest coal-fired electric power plants are in the US & East Asia.

1. Greenhouse Gas Inventory. A memorandum of cooperation between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and China’s National Development and Reform Commission sets out avenues for collaboration on capacity building in climate change, with an initial focus on helping China to develop a robust, transparent and accurate greenhouse gas emissions inventory.

2. Joint Clean Energy Research Center. Originally announced this July, more details were provided on the joint center that will “facilitate joint research and development of clean energy technologies by teams of scientists and engineers from the United States and China, as well as serve as a clearinghouse to help researchers in each country.” Financial support from public and private sources of at least $150 million over five years, split evenly between the two countries, will be provided. The Center’s research will initially focus on building energy efficiency, clean coal including carbon capture and storage, and clean vehicles. (Factsheet)

3. Electric Vehicles. Those initiative will “include joint standards development, demonstration projects in more than a dozen cities, technical roadmapping and public education projects.” (Factsheet)

4. Energy Efficiency. Building on the Ten Year Framework on Energy and Environment Cooperation, government officials of both countries will “work together and with the private sector to develop energy efficient building codes and rating systems, benchmark industrial energy efficiency, train building inspectors and energy efficiency auditors for industrial facilities, harmonize test procedures and performance metrics for energy efficient consumer products, [and] exchange best practices in energy efficient labeling systems.” (Factsheet)

5. Renewable Energy. The two countries will develop roadmaps for wide-spread renewable energy deployment in both countries. The Partnership will also provide technical and analytical resources to states and regions in both countries to support renewable energy deployment and will facilitate state-to-state and region-to-region partnerships to share experience and best practices. (Factsheet)

6. 21st Century Coal. The two countries will “launch a program of technical cooperation to bring teams of U.S. and Chinese scientists and engineers together in developing clean coal and carbon capture and storage technologies.” The Presidents also welcomed a package of announcements on public-private partnerships in advanced coal technologies. (Factsheet)

7. Shale Gas. Under a new Shale Gas Initiative, the U.S. and China will “use experience gained in the United States to assess China’s shale gas potential, promote environmentally-sustainable development of shale gas resources, conduct joint technical studies to accelerate development of shale gas resources in China, and promote shale gas investment in China through the U.S.-China Oil and Gas Industry Forum, study tours, and workshops.” (Factsheet)

8. Nuclear. The two countries reaffirmed the goals of the recently-concluded Third Executive Committee Meeting of the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership to promote the peaceful use of civilian nuclear energy, and “ agreed to consult with one another in order to explore such approaches—including assurance of fuel supply and cradle-to-grave nuclear fuel management so that countries can access peaceful nuclear power while minimizing the risks of proliferation.”

9. Public-private partnerships on clean energy. A new U.S.-China Energy Cooperation Program (ECP) will “leverage private sector resources for project development work in China across a broad array of clean energy projects, to the benefit of both nations.” The ECP, consisting of at least 22 founding member companies, will work on collaborative projects in renewable energy, smart grid, clean transportation, green building, clean coal, combined heat and power, and energy efficiency.

Nuclear Power Caricature
Politics As Usual plus Business As Usual And Above All Else equals Destruction of Life on the Planet as We know It

In a joint statement, President Barack Obama and President Hu Jintao agreed on a common approach to achieve a successful outcome in international climate negotiations (CP emphasis is in bold):

Regarding the upcoming Copenhagen Conference, both sides agree on the importance of actively furthering the full, effective and sustained implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in accordance with the Bali Action Plan. The United States and China, consistent with their national circumstances, resolve to take significant mitigation actions and recognize the important role that their countries play in promoting a sustainable outcome that will strengthen the world’s ability to combat climate change. The two sides resolve to stand behind these commitments.

In this context both sides believe that, while striving for final legal agreement, an agreed outcome at Copenhagen should, based on the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, include emission reduction targets of developed countries and nationally appropriate mitigation actions of developing countries. The outcome should also substantially scale up financial assistance to developing countries, promote technology development, dissemination and transfer, pay particular attention to the needs of the poorest and most vulnerable to adapt to climate change, promote steps to preserve and enhance forests, and provide for full transparency with respect to the implementation of mitigation measures and provision of financial, technology and capacity building support.

So, for any AG scorekeepers out there in cyberspace, we have 3 issues that rate above ground (#1, #2, & #3) , 3 that require a code book (#4, #5, & #9), and 3 that definitely are below ground (#6, #7, & #8).

#1 GHG Inventory
Good.
#2 Joint Research
Sounds good. Who is going to argue with more study, eh?
#3 Electric Vehicles
Good, as far as it goes. I have yet to winter mine because it has been warm during the day in Upstate New York.
#4 Energy Efficiency
Look, Amory, Lip Service
#5 Renewable Energy
Does that mean China wants to sell us solar panels to power our Chinese made EVs?
#6 21st Century Schizoid Plan More Coal
Man, you sure got some dirty air here in Beijing.
#7 Shale Gas
(Editor’s note: Did you read the Full Disclosure? Fine.)
You’re in the Pickens Army now
You’re not behind a plow
You t’ain’t the one getting rich, biatch
Might as well move to Love Canal.
#8 Mo’ Nuklar
Uranium future(s), anyone?
#9 BAUAAAE
Nuff said.

No Coal
No longer can we claim ignorance. Denial equates to death on a planetary scale.

O.K., enough snarkiness, where is the compassion? Greenwashers need to make a living, too, what with the cost of Washington Theater these days and trying to save for the kid’s college, it has to be exceptionally tough when the boss says, “Have I got a great plan or what?” So, the last word for now on the shale gas proposal will go to JR.

China has massive energy needs. CSP and wind with gas (plus the nuclear they are building) can cover a lot of new generation, but we need to replace existing plants to. So shale gas instead of coal is NOT business as usual. It can re-power existing coal plants — and in China we’ll need to replace existing coal plants with something with far lower emissions. Also, one can do CCS with gas, and probably to much greater effect. A gas plant with 50% CCS equals a coal plant with 80% CCS. China is will need to slash emissions at all those coal plants it built in the last two decades. Gas could play a key role for China.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Other Possibly Related AG Posts Automatically Generated

7 Comments

  1. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-18 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    Just remember, every time you advocate use of clean energy resources, you make this ear-tagged, Congress critter cry.

    Repugnants in Attack Formation
    Photo via the AP, by Pablo Martinez Monsivais

  2. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-18 at 8:37 pm | Permalink

    July 2009:

    “Though the price of coal has plummeted in the downturn and it is expected to remain weak in the near-term, coal markets “are ultimately likely to rebound with a roar,” Rick Navarre, the president of Peabody Energy, one of the world’s largest coal companies, was quoted by Reuters as saying last week.”

    What is the coal industry looking to for growth? Coal gasification projects – the front end of both FutureGen “clean coal demonstration projects” and coal-to-gasoline plants. FutureGen is the $2 billion coal project in Illinois that the press refuses to discuss – with good reason, since it is a giant fraud that will likely be transferred to Illinois coal producers and converted to a coal-to-gasoline plant.

    Obama has a long record of boosting coal-to-gasoline programs while he was an Illinois senator, and he has directed the Department of Energy to continue with this program, which he is billing as “an effort to reduce our independence on crude oil imports.”

    It’s kind of hard to sell that when the Obama Administration is also backing increased Canadian tar sand oil imports – delivering subsidies to Alaskan-sourced gas supply pipelines for tar sand oil expansion, granting pipeline permits to Enbridge, a major syncrude shipper – even cutting new leases for offshore oil drilling in the remote Chukchi Sea. Likewise, there is the extensive diplomatic outreach related to oil deals in Africa, for example the recent Clinton oil patch tour.

    More realistically, the Chinese and American leaders are probably coordinating their pre-event sabotage of any Copenhagen accords at the behest of the coal lobby, which for the past thirty years has relied more and more on deceptive delaying tactics.

    The basic point is this: in the U.S., thanks to the sabotage of Copenhagen and the heavy lobbying and (legal campaign finance-related) bribing of politicians by the fossil fuel industry, the tar sand imports and coal-to-gasoline programs will not face any legal challenges under any binding laws.

    That’s all. Everything else is unimportant rhetoric – inspiring, aspirational, hopeful, forward-looking propaganda designed to convince the public that “something is being done.”

    Who is buying it? The scientific fact is that we need to replace dirty fossil fuels with truly renewable energy sources – but the politicos won’t say “renewable energy” because that rules out coal. “Clean energy” is thus just a political code word for “clean coal,” which is just greenwashing – aka, business as usual.

    The technical engineering fact is that sunlight, wind and photosynthesis can meet all human energy needs – but oddly enough, the U.S. press is reluctant to discuss this. Could it be that fossil fuel ownership of corporate media in the U.S. in the main factor influencing this debate?

    If that was the case, than some brave politician needs to suggest anti-trust legislation aimed at banning media holding companies and breaking up press outlets into small, independent corporate entities.

    Oddly enough, that might be what is needed to effectively alter the planet’s climate trajectory.

  3. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-18 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    More important than COP15? Shoo, more important than life on the planet as we know it.

  4. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-19 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    According to Green Car Congress, the US-China Electric Vehicles Initiative, which was announced in Beijing by US President Barack Obama and China President Hu Jintao as part of a package of seven measures to strengthen cooperation between the United States and China on clean energy, builds on the first-ever US-China Electric Vehicle Forum, which took place in September 2009.

    The two leaders emphasized their countries’ strong shared interest in accelerating the deployment of electric vehicles in order to reduce oil dependence, cut greenhouse gas emissions and promote economic growth. Activities under the initiative will include:

    • Joint standards development. The two countries will explore development of joint product and testing standards for electric vehicles. This will include common design standards for plugs to be used in electric vehicles, as well as common test protocols for batteries and other devices. Each country currently has extensive literature and data on its own standards. Making this information mutually available and working towards common standards can help facilitate rapid deployment of electric vehicles in both countries.

    • Joint demonstrations. The Initiative will link more than a dozen cities with electric vehicle demonstration programs in both countries. Paired cities will collect and share data on charging patterns, driving experiences, grid integration, consumer preferences and other topics. The demonstrations will help facilitate large-scale introduction of this technology.

    • Joint technical roadmap. A US-China task force will create a multi-year roadmap to identify R&D needs as well as issues related to the manufacture, introduction and use of electric vehicles. The roadmap will be made widely available to assist not just US and Chinese developers, but also the global automotive industry. It will be updated regularly to reflect advances in technology and the evolution of the marketplace.

    • Public awareness and engagement. The United States and China will develop and disseminate materials to improve public understanding of electric vehicle technologies. Building on the success of the first-even US-China Electric Vehicles Forum in September 2009, the United States and China will sponsor the event annually, alternating between the two countries. The Forum will bring together key stakeholders in both countries to share information on best practices and identify new areas for collaboration.

  5. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-19 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    Since this blog learned that, while he was an Illinois senator, Barack Obama established a long record of boosting coal-to-gasoline programs, some other things become more evident. For instance, Green Car Congress informs that General Electric and Shenhua Group Corporation have agreed to a framework for an industrial coal gasification joint venture.

    According to GCC, this agreement was one of a series of GE agreements signed in China this week. One might assume that GE’s expertise in gasification and cleaner power generation technologies in combination with Shenhua’s expertise in building and operating coal gasification and coal-fired power generation facilities, to progress advanced coal technology solutions in China, is an example not only of 21st Century Coal, but also of what is meant by “public-private partnerships”.

  6. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-19 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Based upon a flurry of reports about electric vehicles coming to America, one might assume that Green Car Congress is excited at the prospect. GCC relays word of a call from the Electrification Coalition that by 2040 75% of Light-Duty Vehicle Miles Traveled in the US should be via electric-drive.

    “Business leaders representing the entire value chain of an electrified transportation system,” reports GCC, have released “a report outlining a vision for the deployment of a fully integrated electric drive network.”

    “Prepared in partnership with the organization Securing America’s Future Energy (SAFE) and in consultation with PRTM management consultants for market analysis and technical input,” the Electrification Roadmap “proposes completely transforming the US light-duty vehicle fleet into one in which grid-enabled mobility is the new conventional standard.”

    As a result, oil consumption in the light-duty fleet would be reduced to just 2.0 mbd, compared to today’s level of 8.6 mbd, and it is conceivable that US oil imports could effectively be reduced to zero.

    …In order to reach the goal of 75 percent electric miles by 2040, the US light-duty vehicle market will need to have reached a tipping point by 2020. This is defined as the point at which grid-enabled vehicles represent 25 percent of new LDV purchases. The specific technology—plug-in hybrid electric or pure electric—is not as important as the share that such vehicles represent of the new vehicle portfolio. Different GEV (Grid-Enabled Vehicle) technologies will meet different drivers’ needs, but the concept of electrification cannot move beyond a niche application until at least one-quarter of new vehicle consumers are willing to adopt the technology.

    —Electrification Roadmap

    Graph of Projected Miles Traveled by grid and non-grid enabled, light-duty vehicles“The Electrification Roadmap calls for 75% of light-duty VMT in the US to be electric by 2040. Achieving this will require a minimum of 25% of new light-duty vehicles purchased in the US to be grid-enabled vehicles by 2020.”

    The goal of deploying more than 200 million electric-powered vehicles is ambitious and should not be understated, the report notes. The envisioned change demands synchronized deployment of new vehicles and infrastructure on a massive scale. Altering the existing ground transportation system—which represents more than a century of private investment and government regulation, “requires an exceedingly careful and thorough planning process, to which this report seeks to make a helpful contribution.”

    The roadmap report examines the challenges facing electrification, including battery technology and cost, infrastructure financing, regulatory requirements, electric power sector interface, and consumer acceptance issues. The report is intended to provide policymakers and business leaders with a framework for overcoming these challenges in order to drive meaningful reductions in US oil dependence.

    In addition to examining the scope of the challenges, the report makes a number of recommendations to address them, including:

    • Establish tax credits for installing automotive-grade batteries in stationary applications to help drive scale and contribute to reducing battery cost.

    • Establish loan guarantees for retooling automotive assembly lines.

    • Modify building codes to promote GEV adoption.

    • Promote the inclusion of GEV-related investment in the utility rate base.

    • Adjust utility rate structures to facilitate GEV deployment.

    • Establish a guaranteed residual value for used large format
      automotive batteries.

    • Review existing regulations on vehicle warranties.

  7. jcwinnie
    Posted 2009-11-19 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Won’t you be my… What the F?

2 Trackbacks

  1. [...] previous post contained a Full Disclosure statement: This blog lives over a part of the Marcellus Shale Appalachian Basin. [...]

  2. [...] (Business As Usual And Above All Else) prevails in U.S. energy policy. This blog criticizes such policy, sometimes [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 2398 access attempts in the last 7 days.