Subtitle: You have to go back a ways
James Lovelock has written that sea level rise is a trustworthy indicator of the “Earth’s heat balance.” Aradhna Tripati, UCLA assistant professor in the department of Earth and space sciences and the department of atmospheric and oceanic sciences, sees a discrepancy between current concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere and the existing ocean level.
As Tripati and colleagues reported Oct. 8 in the online edition of the journal Science (via Climate Progress), “The last time carbon dioxide levels were apparently as high as they are today — and were sustained at those levels — global temperatures were 5 to 10 degrees Fahrenheit higher than they are today, the sea level was approximately 75 to 120 feet higher than today, there was no permanent sea ice cap in the Arctic and very little ice on Antarctica and Greenland.”
The reason for the discrepancy? Until recent decades, levels of carbon dioxide have varied only between 180 and 300 parts per million.

In 1800 the level of CO2 was 280 ppm. There has been a 100 ppm rise in the concentration of CO2 and, as Climate Progress commentator Jeande Beagles opines, we have yet to pay for that increase. The price tag? We can expect to see much higher sea levels.
There is general consensus among climate scientists that modern-day levels of carbon dioxide are unprecedented over the last 800,000 years. The authors of the new study, “Coupling of CO2 and Ice Sheet Stability Over Major Climate Transitions of the Last 20 Million Years,” contend that the levels over the last 15 million years have been lower than modern levels.
Thus, as the saying goes, for those who have expressed concern that in the past decade sea level rise has been at an unimaginable rate of increase, “you ain’t seen nothing yet.”
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=1c3767e1-0e66-46d7-8007-ffeb0d7fa99d)



4 Comments
Speaking of very little ice on Greenland or Antarctica (Jo-Jo calls it “Dynamic Thinning“, the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (not to be confused with Doktor Chooster’s Fischer Tropsch Laboratories, Inc.) has mapped how climate change will have an impact around the globe. Brooklyn Treehugger Brian Merchant relays announcement of a world map indicating where.
With a 4 degree Celsius temperature rise, crop yields will fall in North America, sea levels will rise especially high around Bangladesh and India, ice sheets would decline in Greenland, and most of South America will face a water crisis.
Ice sheet decline is one impact represented. Other major impacts mapped include: a decline in crop yields, rising sea levels, and negative effects upon marine ecosystems and fresh water resources.
It should be noted that such change already is occurring, as global heating increases.
Other related Treehugger posts
World Changing contributor Alex Aylett has more mapping climate change impact.
Climate scientists now warn that if we remain on our present emissions path, then sea levels may rise three times faster than the official predictions of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). The global average sea level may increase by as much as 1.9 metres (6ft 3in) by 2100.
Projection of sea-level rise from 1990 to 2100, based on IPCC temperature projections for three different emission scenarios. “We are currently on the A1F1 emissions trajectory,” says Joe Romm, “though I am hopeful that the agreement coming out of Copenhagen coupled with the bipartisan U.S. climate bill will take us off that trajectory.”
Bottom line: the midrange sea level rise projection is now about 5 feet by century’s end. “Such prediction is consistent with many other recent studies, informs Climate Progress researchers.
Another 2007 study from Nature Geoscience came to the same conclusion
Washington, D.C. Treehugger Alexandra Giese, a staff researcher at the Earth Policy Institute and colleague of Lester Brown, reminds us, while climate conditions are local, changes in climate is occurring around the globe.
The accelerating loss of ice sheets, sea ice, and glaciers is one of the most powerful and striking indicators of a warming climate.
More Treehugger posts on the topic of Increased Ice Melting
“According to a recent scientific analysis published in Nature, notes Brad Johnson, “an additional 2 degrees of global warming could commit the planet to 6 to 9 meters (20 to 30 feet) of long-term sea level rise,” which would “permanently submerge New Orleans and other parts of southern Louisiana.”
Which gives greenie-weenie-zines like Climate Progress and Think Progress pause for thought… Why would the state that stands to suffer the most from human-caused global elect leaders who want efforts to avoid its inundation stopped?
By elected officials, they mean both Senators — see Senator Vitter of Katrina-ravaged Louisiana tries to block climate change response centers and Sen. Vitter opposes Lieberman-Warner and Landrieu wants to jettison cap-and-trade. And it’s true of the Governor (and presidential hopeful), as Think Progress explains:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finally moving to regulate global warming pollution. One of the leading opponents to the EPA’s proposed regulations, slated to go into effect in March, 2010, is Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA). On Monday, Jindal “and the secretaries of the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and Louisiana Economic Development filed objections with EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson,” claiming the Supreme-Court-mandated standards “will certainly have profound negative economic impacts“.
Related Post:
One Trackback
[...] in carbon emissions. Such delay and denial defied the increasing dire scientific warnings about the climate consequences of further inaction. “The easiest yardstick to evaluate is the two degree target,” said [...]