California pioneered solar PV incentive program

This blog previously noted that, in the absence of federal initiative, states now are leading the way in Solar Energy development. Cooler Planet via Climate Progress relays solar PV (photovoltaic) installation data from the California Energy Commission.

Bush touring United Solar Ovonic manufacturing plant
Growth of solar photo voltaic installations has gone from only 1,675 grid connected photovoltaic installations in 2002 to 29,628 installations in 2008. State incentive plans, pioneered by California and replicated in Florida and other states, are credited with such growth.

According to SolarBuzz:

In 2006, 112 megawatts of solar photovoltaics were installed in the US Grid Connect market, up from 80 megawatts in 2005. Demand was led once again by California, which accounted for 63% of the national market. Notwithstanding funding program bottlenecks, New Jersey saw very strong growth in 2006, representing 17% of the national market.

Earl Killian rhetorically asks Climate Progress readers, “Why would California and New Jersey, with only 12% and 2.9% of U.S. population respectively, account for such a large fraction of PV installations?”

Perhaps, incentive programs (most recently the California Solar Initiative and the New Jersey Clean Energy Rebate Program) and other policies are working.

Internationally, Germany (8.8× U.S. in 2006 MW installed) and Japan (2.6× U.S.) are the leaders in PV installations, with California a “distant third” according to Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Spanish Trade Group Visits German PV Installation
Germany has become a world leader in renewable energy through federal legislation. Industry observers attribute such a successful solar energy industry to implementation of a feed-in tariff.

Most places where PV is economic have some combination of the following (but usually not all):

  1. Efficient use of energy, e.g. California, New Jersey, Japan, and Germany (but much of the U.S. is inefficient) . Efficiency is cheaper than PV, so it pays to do that first. If you’re already efficient, PV may make sense.
  2. High retail electricity rates (e.g. California, New Jersey, and Japan, maybe Germany–note: high rates do not mean high bills; California’s are about the same as the rest of the nation because of efficiency) .
  3. Rebates / Incentives (e.g. California, New Jersey, and Japan) .
  4. Time of Use (TOU) net metering available (e.g. California, probably others) . With net metering, your electric meter runs backward when you generate more than you use, and runs forward other times. With TOU the rate you pay or receive varies by time of day, typically with afternoon rates much higher than other times, reflecting the much higher cost of electricity to utilities during times of heaviest load.
  5. High insolation (e.g. California, but definitely not Germany or New Jersey) .
  6. Financing (e.g. home equity loans in U.S., “soft loans” in Germany), so that PV is profitable in the first month instead of requiring multiple years to break even (the payment on the equity loan should be less than the cost of the electricity purchases avoided) .

Galiteva and Nanayakkara
In the 2002 Johnson & Johnson Corporate Report, Angelina Galiteva, the director of strategic planning, Los Angeles Department of Water & Power, appeared with Senaka Nanayakkara, Neutrogena director of facilities engineering, behind a backdrop of 62,000 square feet of solar panels, the largest commercial solar rooftop installation in California. The company developed a partnership with the City of Los Angeles to reduce operating costs and monthly energy consumption for the company by 35 percent.

Three other points probably help to avoid utility hostility:

  • Decoupling (the idea that utility profits are not tied to revenue, since customer PV reduces utility revenue) .
  • Significant excess daytime load over nighttime (since PV avoids the need for costly “peaking” power plants) .
  • Renewable Portfolio Standards (e.g. Germany, Japan, and California) that mandate certain percentages of renewable energy.

Of the various items, incentives (#3) are helpful, time of use net metering may be the most important. For example, under PG&E’s E-7 rate for PV, one can sell PV electricity back to the grid during peak hours at $0.30/kWh, and then buy it back off-peak at $0.09/kWh. That factor of three makes a difference.

Other Possibly Related AG Posts Automatically Generated

2 Comments

  1. jcwinnie
    Posted 2008-2-1 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Solar PV panels with tracking system

    Earl K. writes:

    Just after yesterday’s post on photovoltaic (PV) installs in CA and NJ, I found a 43-page update from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) in my inbox. The second paragraph of the executive summary tells the good news:

    Despite the transition to a new program, demand is robust. In the first twelve months, demand for CPUC-administered California Solar Initiative incentives exceeds California’s total installed solar from the previous 26 years. Since 1981, California installed 198 megawatts (MW) of grid integrated solar statewide. From January 1 through December 31, 2007, the California Solar Initiative program has applications for 208.6 MW of new solar. Disregarding applications that have been withdrawn or rejected, the program has received 7,541 applications, worth $558 million in incentives. Residential applications dwarf all others (6,712 applications) and are 89% of the total applications, but only comprise 15% of the total MW in the active applications. The 829 non-residential applications from commercial, government, and non-profit applicants make up 11% of the total applications. The non-residential applications are 176.8 MW in active applications.

    In 2006 the U.S. installed 108 MW of PV. If most of the 209 MW of applications reported above are built in 2008 (18 MW where already operating in 2007), we will see at least a doubling of U.S. PV.

    The California Solar Initiative (CSI) is budgeted for $3.3 billion of incentives over 10 years for 3,000 MW. Incentives will decrease in ten steps over the 10 years so even if applications in the first year are $533 million, this does not indicate CSI will run out of funds. Non-residential applications appear to be ahead of goals, while residential is lagging somewhat.

    Also, Cooler Planet has added more features to their interactive map, so you may want to check it out again.

  2. jcwinnie
    Posted 2008-5-21 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    For World Watch Institute, Janet L. Sawin provides an excellent summation of the status of the global photo voltaic market.

    Global production of photovoltaic (PV) or solar cells-which convert the sun’s light directly to electricity-increased 51 percent in 2007, to 3,733 megawatts. According to early estimates, more than 2,935 megawatts of solar modules were installed that year, bringing cumulative global installations of PVs since 1996 to more than 9,740 megawatts-enough to meet the annual electricity demand of more than 3 million homes in Europe. Over the past five years, annual global production of PV cells has increased nearly sevenfold, and cumulative installations have grown more than fivefold.

    Europe-led by Germany-passed Japan to lead the world in PV manufacture, producing an estimated 1,063 megawatts of solar cells in 2007, up 56 percent over 2006. About 40,000 people are now employed in the PV industry in Germany alone, and the German company Q-Cells outproduced Japan’s Sharp to become the number one manufacturer worldwide.

    Germany remains the world’s top PV installer, accounting for almost half of the global market in 2007. Thanks to the country’s feed-in tariff for renewable electricity, which requires utilities to pay customers a guaranteed rate for any renewable power they feed into the grid, Germans installed about 1,300 megawatts of new PV capacity, up from 850 megawatts in 2006, for a total exceeding 3,830 megawatts. As capacity has risen, PV installed system costs have been cut in half in Germany between 1997 and 2007. PVs now meet about 1 percent of Germany’s electricity demand, a share that some analysts expect could reach 25 percent by 2050.

    Japan continued to produce more PV cells than any other individual country, with 920 megawatts manufactured in 2007. But Japan’s share of the world total fell from 37 percent in 2006 to just below 25 percent. Unable to compete with China and Taiwan for low-cost solar cells, Japanese manufacturers have changed tactics and are looking beyond conventional crystalline silicon cells to thin-film technology. Domestic installations in Japan declined from 286 megawatts in 2006 to an estimated 230 megawatts in 2007.

    China climbed rapidly to become the second largest cell-producing nation after Japan, manufacturing about 820 megawatts of PVs and accounting for 22 percent of global production. But annual production capacity reached almost 1,590 megawatts by the end of the year, well ahead of any other country (though still 9 percent below all of Europe). Despite these impressive numbers, the Chinese market for PVs remains small, and much of the 20 megawatts of new capacity installed in 2007 was for remote off-grid applications. Taiwan is also experiencing dramatic growth in production, manufacturing 368 megawatts of cells in 2007 and ending the year with the capacity to produce 710 megawatts annually.

    Spain ranked second after Germany for total installations in 2007 but accounts for only an estimated 3 percent of global production. According to estimates, Spain added anywhere from 425 to 640 megawatts in 2007, up from fewer than 100 megawatts in 2006. This puts the country well ahead of the government’s official target of 400 megawatts by 2010. The market in Spain is being driven by a strong guaranteed price for PV electricity.

    In the United States, cell production rose 48 percent to 266 megawatts. Although this represents a dramatic increase in production from the once world-leading U.S. solar industry, the nation’s shares of global production and installations continued to fall in 2007. PV cell production accounted for only 7 percent of the global total, down slightly relative to 2006. But U.S. manufacturers are now focused on the “next wave” of solar technologies: in 2007, the United States accounted for approximately two thirds of global thin-film production.

    An estimated 150 megawatts of new gridconnected PV capacity was installed in the United States in 2007, up about 45 percent over the previous year, putting the nation in fourth place for total capacity-behind Germany, Japan, and Spain. California continued to dominate the U.S. market, though growth was slower than expected because of changes in state incentive levels and a weak dollar. U.S. utilities are beginning to recognize the potential value of solar PV: in early 2008, Southern California Edison announced plans to install 250 megawatts of distributed capacity over the next five years.

    Other countries becoming major players include Italy (25-50 megawatts installed), South Korea (50 megawatts), and France (45 megawatts), all thanks to new or strengthened feed-in laws. In addition, India installed an estimated 20 megawatts, and Portugal added 10 megawatts. Some of Portugal’s additions were part of a large solar plant that came online in early 2007 and will generate enough electricity to meet the needs of 8,000 households.

    Such strong growth occurred against a backdrop of polysilicon shortages-supply has been tight since 2005, driven mainly by strong policies pushing demand growth. However, significant new capacity will start to come online in the second half of 2008. The European Photovoltaic Industry Association projects 80,000 tons of annual production by 2010, up from just over 37,000 tons in 2007. Some analysts are predicting excess capacity within the next few years, and in early 2008 China-based Trina Solar canceled plans for a new 10,000-ton polysilicon production facility.

    The current shortage is driving advances in thin film technologies, which require no polysilicon. Thin films are composed of very thin layers of photosensitive materials and require less energy and materials to make than conventional silicon-based solar cells and are cheaper to produce. They can be integrated into roof shingles, siding, and the windows of buildings. After decades of market disappointment, thin-film production has increased nearly fourfold in the past two years, claiming more than 10 percent of the global market in 2007.

    Performance data for such technologies are relatively limited, and efficiencies remain low compared with conventional solar cells. But the situation is rapidly improving-commercial efficiencies rose from 9 to 10 percent in 2007, and in early 2008 researchers at the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory set a new record at 19.9 percent efficient, close to commercial levels for conventional cells. Because of the potential for dramatic cost reduction, many researchers view thin films as the future of solar. The solar industry attracted $3 billion in equity during 2007, with some of the biggest investments going to young solar companies in the United States and to thin-film technologies.

    Scientists are also working on a range of third- and fourth-generation PV technologies. German researchers have developed a prototype solar module that uses organic dyes combined with nanoparticles, applied to glass with a screen printing technique, to generate electricity. Konarka Technologies successfully conducted its first demonstration of manufacturing PV cells with ink-jet printing in early 2008. And companies in the United States and Europe are exploring ways to turn road surfaces into solar power generators.

    Thanks to economies of scale, rising conversion efficiencies, and more-efficient use of polysilicon in conventional cells, average PV module prices declined in 2007, even as polysilicon prices rose. Stronger than expected demand growth in Spain helped keep global PV prices higher in 2007 than some had predicted. But analysts and industry leaders alike expect continued price reductions in the near future through further economies of scale and increased optimization in assembly and installation. The Prometheus Institute projects that installed system prices for large projects will fall 50 percent by 2010, to $4 per watt peak (without incentives) in the best locations.

    Solar electricity is likely to become cost-competitive with the retail price of electricity in many parts of the world in the next several years. As Jesse Pichel of New York’s Piper Jaffray said recently: “Whether it’s 2010, 2012, or 2015, I think everyone can see the writing on the wall.” When solar becomes competitive with conventional power, “solar power demand is infinite.”

One Trackback

  1. [...] blog previously has noted that, in the absence of federal initiative, states are leading the way in Solar Energy development, [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 2397 access attempts in the last 7 days.