Prenergy Power’s Port Talbot Biomass Power Plant

No Coal is Clean Coal
According to the IPCC Synthesis Report, the most important time-critical action needed to avert climate disasters concerns coal. A surge in global coal use in the last few years has converted a potential slowdown of CO2 emissions into a more rapid increase. A moratorium on coal-fuel electric power generation must begin in the West, which is responsible for three-quarters of climate change (via 75% of the present atmospheric CO2 excess, above the pre-industrial level).

This blog recently reported on a Corn to Ethanol plant that was improving its EROEI by burning waste wood from pallets, construction sites and area landfills for thermoelectric power. The developers expected that the solid waste fuel boiler should generate enough steam to produce more than half of the expanded plant’s power needs. The post also referred to a previous report of a solid waster boiler at NW Missouri State that burns a mix of 80% wood chips, 15% pelletized paper / trash from the campus and 5% pelletized animal waste.

More recently, there was information about a biomass fueled power station that in addition to electricity, would provide sufficient thermal energy to meet about 75 per cent of district heating requirement in the city of Kerava, Finland.

Now the Biopact team reports that approval has been received to build a 350MW biomass fueled thermoelectric power plant that developers expect will be able to meet the electric power requirement of around 1.5 million people, or about half of all homes in Wales. (This is much larger than the previously noted, wood chip fired power plant planned in Scotland.)

The Biopact post notes the opening of a 30MW station that would run on domestically sourced waste wood and biomass from energy crops, in addition to the plant being built in Scotland. The first ‘large’ biomass power plant opened in the UK “is expected to generate electricity for 30,000 homes.”

E.ON UK Combustion Rig

Another large biomass plant is being built in Lockerbie, Scotland, that will be fueled by short rotation coppice energy crops. The £90 (€133/US$178) million E.ON facility is expected to be fully operational by the end of the year and will generate enough electricity to power 70,000 homes, provides over 300 jobs in the forestry and energy farming sector, and displaces the emission of 140,000 tonnes of greenhouse gases each year.

There are less emissions from burning biomass than from coal-fired electric power generation. Nevertheless, gas scrubbing must remove 96% to 99% of all particulate matter and tar aerosols. Plans are that after combustion of the biomass at the proposed biomass-fueled power plant in Wales, “the flue gasses will pass through a fabric filter to remove 99.99% of the entrained dust, and will then flow up a 100 m tall stack designed for optimal flue gas dispersion.”

There will be no need for sulphur or chlorine control as the wood fuel does not contain significant quantities of these components. Furthermore, wood ash is inherently alkaline in composition and will capture trace amounts of chlorine, fluorine and sulphur from the exhaust gas. The wood will also have minimal ash content, producing less than 150,000 tonnes per year of ash which will be sold to the cement and fertiliser industry and transported from the Renewable Energy Plant by sea and / or road.

Transport is the sticking point. Removal of byproducts and delivery of feedstock add to the overall emissions resulting from power generation. “The renewable energy station will burn about 3 million tonnes of woody biomass shipped in each year from overseas, mainly from the United States and Canada.”

Clean (virgin, unused) wood chip will be delivered to the development site in ‘Panamax’ vessels. Each vessel will hold approximately 45,000 tonnes of wood chip and will unload at the existing jetty. New cranes will discharge onto a new conveyor system which will move the wood chip to the fuel storage area.

Other Possibly Related AG Posts Automatically Generated

2 Comments

  1. jcwinnie
    Posted 2007-11-26 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    According to European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, there has been a marked growth in European electricity generation from solid biomass “with a 16.2% increase between 2004 and 2005 (+6.1 TWh, i.e. a total of 44.1 TWh).”

    The information from the Energy Directorate makes a distinction between “renewable municipal solid waste”, which is principally household waste, and “solid biomass”, which is principally wood and wood waste, but also straw, crop harvest residues, vegetal and animal waste.

    Primary energy production coming from renewable solid urban waste (that is to say excluding biogas production) is estimated in the European Union at 5.3 Mtoe for 2005.

    This is far less than primary energy production coming from solid biomass, which is estimated in the European Union at 58,783 Mtoe, or millions of tonnes of oil equivalent, for 2005.

    CHP (Combined Heat and Power) is the principal technology used to produce electricity from solid biomass, since it accounts for more than three-quarters of this total production.

  2. jcwinnie
    Posted 2007-11-27 at 7:34 am | Permalink

    Vaxjo Solid Biomass Power Plant
    Bioenergy Småland – Expo Växjö.

    The Big Gav, a.k.a., Mister “I’ve Got a Dead Rodent in My Pants, What Have You Got, Mister?“, reports that the Swedish town of Vaxjo also uses wood chips as the primary mechanism for reducing emissions. In their case, the wood chips and waste are locally produced and the ash is returned to the forests, which makes the process sound a lot more sustainable.

    When this quiet city in southern Sweden decided in 1996 to wean itself off fossil fuels, many people doubted the ambitious goal would have any impact beyond the town limits. Today, however, Vaxjo is attracting a green pilgrimage of politicians, scientists and business leaders from as far away as the United States and North Korea seeking inspiration from a city program that has allowed it to cut CO2 emissions 30 percent since 1993.

    Vaxjo is a pioneer in a growing movement in dozens of European cities, large and small, that aren’t waiting for national or international measures aimed at curbing climate change.

    From London’s congestion charge to Paris’ city bike program and Barcelona’s solar power campaign, initiatives taken at the local level are being introduced across the continent — often influencing national policies instead of the other way around.

    “People used to ask: Isn’t it better to do this at a national or international level?” said Henrik Johansson, environmental controller in Vaxjo, a city of 78,000 on the shores of Lake Helga, surrounded by thick pine forest in the heart of Smaland province. “We want to show everyone else that you can accomplish a lot at the local level.” …

    In Vaxjo, (pronounced VECK-shur), the vast majority of emissions cuts have been achieved at the city’s heating and power plant, which replaced oil with wood chips from local sawmills as its main source of fuel. Ashes from the furnace are returned to the forest as nutrients.

    “This is the best fir in Sweden,” said plant manager Ulf Johnsson, scooping up a fistful of wood chips from a giant heap outside the factory.

    He had just led Michael Wood, the U.S. ambassador to Sweden, on a guided tour of the facility, which is considered state of the art. Not only does it generate electricity, but the water that is warmed up in the process of cooling the plant is used to heat homes and offices in Vaxjo.

    A similar but much larger system is in place in Copenhagen, Denmark’s capital, where waste heat from incineration and combined heat and power plants is pumped through a purpose-built 800-mile network of pipes to 97 percent of city.

    Copenhagen is often cited as a climate pioneer among European cities. It cut CO2 emissions by 187,600 tons annually in the late 1990s by switching from coal to natural gas and biofuels at its energy plants. Its goal is to reduce emissions by 35 percent by 2010, compared to 1990 levels, even more ambitious than Denmark’s national target of 21 percent cuts under the Kyoto accord.

    In 1995, Copenhagen became one of the first European capitals to introduce a public bicycle service that lets people pick up and return bikes at dozens of stations citywide for a small fee. Similar initiatives have since taken root in Paris and several other European cities. Next, Copenhagen plans to spend about $38 million on various initiatives to get more residents to use bicycles instead of cars.

    Transport is one of the hardest areas for local leaders to control since traffic is not confined to a single city. Without stronger national policies promoting biofuels over gasoline, Vaxjo, for one, will never reach its long-term target of becoming free of fossil fuels. But it’s doing what it can locally. So-called green cars running on biofuels park for free anywhere in the city. About one-fifth of the city’s own fleet runs on biogas produced at the local sewage treatment plant.

    Vaxjo has also invested in energy efficiency, from the light bulbs used in street lights to a new residential area with Europe’s tallest all-wood apartment buildings. Wood requires less energy to produce than steel or concrete, and also less transportation since Vaxjo is in the middle of forests.

    Although Vaxjo is tiny by comparison, the C40 group, including major metropolitan centers such as New York, Mexico City and Tokyo, has been impressed by the city’s progress and uses it as an example of “best practices” around the world.

    In 2005 primary energy production by means of solid biomass in Sweden was 7.94 million tonnes of oil equivalent, making Sweden second in the European Union only to France at 9.67 Mtoe, and just ahead of Germany at 7.86 Mtoe.

    Wood fuel from the forest makes up a large part of Swedish bioenergy. 25 % of Sweden’s total energy supply is derived from biofuels,” writes SVEBio. “Within heating and industry bioenergy is the major source of energy, and it is now growing steadily in the production of electricity and transport fuels.

4 Trackbacks

  1. [...] After Gutenberg Just another pretty face Skip to content VideoWho Killed the Electric Car?Energy Subcommittee Reviews Plug-in Hybrid100+ MPG Plug-in HybridsGenesis Sumo Electric MotorcycleTitanicGreat Car CommercialPlug-in PartnersPlug-in Hybrid CarsSheryl Crow – Soak Up the SunWe Gotta Step It UpGlobal Warming Testimony @ Congress 3.21.07Greenland is MeltingCollecting the Sun Today to run Your Plug-in Hybrid TomorrowWhat is the Worst That Could Happen?The Power of CommunityANL at Hybridfest 2007 Madison, WIStanford Energy Efficiency Lecture SeriesCBS News Does the Electric CarThe Fleet Meets The Grid in a Carbon Constrained WorldGlobal Heating and EthanolContact FormRate Me « Prenergy Power’s Port Talbot Biomass Power Plant [...]

  2. [...] can generate electricity from waste wood and biomass from agriculture. One such plant being planned for Wales will be able to power half their homes. [...]

  3. [...] of the world where coal is an important fuel for heat and power, there is experimentation with solid biomass as a replacement for coal. Since GHG emissions, principally CO2, from the burning of coal is destructive to the climate, even [...]

  4. [...] is another place on the other side of world, where is experimentation with solid biomass as a replacement for coal. Since Australia is the country with the least efficient combustion of coal for electric power [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 2395 access attempts in the last 7 days.