The Albedo Flip in a BAU GHG emission scenario

Subtitle: BAU == Business as Usual (and above all else); GHG == Green House Gases

Global Warming graphic

To remind late comers to After Gutenberg, albedo is the ratio of reflected to incident electromagnetic radiation. Today, via Green Car Congress, we learn from The Independent about “albedo flip”, i.e., when the sunlight reflected by white ice is suddenly absorbed when the ice melts to become the dark surface of open water.

Reporters of The Indepedent read “Climate change and trace gases” (July 15, 2007), which is a horror story disguised as proceedings in the oldest English-language scientific journal in publication. The Independent tell us the scientific article is a report on research “led by James Hansen, the director of Nasa’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, who was the first scientist to warn the US Congress about global warming… The other scientists were Makiko Sato, Pushker Kharecha and Gary Russell, also of the Goddard Institute, David Lea of the University of California, Santa Barbara, and Mark Siddall of the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University in New York.” Nevertheless, it is a horror story; it involves trace gas biogeochemistry.

Less Arctic Ice Represents Arctic Warming Which Affects Worldwide Climate
NASA Photo

These images illustrate the magnitude of the difference in ice cover, which is about 1.6 million km2, between 1980 and 2003. The comparison shows a dramatic decrease in the Arctic ice cover. One of the reasons for Al Gore to remark in recent testimony before Congress on global warming that “The planet has a fever.”

The researchers have inferred from palaeoclimate data “that a BAU GHG emission scenario would produce global warming of several degrees Celsius this century, with amplification at high latitudes.”

“That’s bad?”

Most assuredly since such warming would activate the albedo-flip trigger mechanism.

OMG

Greenland Ice Sheet Melting Faster than Expected

Yep, imagine that you and your main squeeze are ensconsed comfortably in your cottage listening to Spike Jones when you hear trucks pull up outside. Homeboyz start piling out; it’s right out of the final scenes in the Blue Brothers. They surround your home. More trucks arrive with “special equipment”. You know, the lights and amplifiers they use in hostage situations. They set up the equipment and turn it on. There is an ominous silence. Then Blackhawk helicopters swoop down, a VIP is escorted to the stage. It’s Dick Cheney dressed retro, wearing an Afro wig, carrying a Strat he borrowed from Blair. He strides over to this huge, modified Fender amp (in olive drab), plugs in the guitar, turns and looks directly at you. You feel a chill run down your spine. Then he turns and almost casually flips the albedo switch. He steps up to the microphone and snarls, “It’s the end of your Holocene, baby, now you going to learn ’bout positive feedback.” He strikes the first chord, as ice sheets disintegrate and there is a burst of added global warming. As the smoke bombs go off and the lasers flash, three other players appear dressed as Arab princes. You groan and fall to you knees, as you realize, it is the Haliburtons doing their hit single “Climate Forcing”.

In combination with warming of the nearby ocean and atmosphere, the increased surface melt would bring into play multiple positive feedbacks leading to eventual nonlinear ice sheet disintegration… An ice sheet response time of centuries seems probable, and we cannot rule out large changes on decadal time-scales once wide-scale surface melt is underway. With GHGs continuing to increase, the planetary energy imbalance provides ample energy to melt ice corresponding to several metres of sea level per century.

No Question about Not Hot; It's How Hot?

Other Possibly Related AG Posts Automatically Generated

2 Comments

  1. jcwinnie
    Posted 2007-6-19 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    Joe Romm is happy to report that “partly by design and partly by accident” “liquid coal goes down in flames in the Senate.”

  2. jcwinnie
    Posted 2007-6-20 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    Via Plugs and Cars, we hear from The Independent of London that, as Tony Blair left Washington yesterday for his last visit as Prime Minister, the Bush administration was acting to scupper international efforts to combat climate change.

    Less than 24 hours earlier, Mr Blair had basked in the apparent support of President George Bush for his stated aim of avoiding catastrophic global warming. But it seems his appeals have fallen on deaf ears. While Mr Bush was eulogising his friend in the White House rose garden, the President’s delegation at a United Nations meeting in Bonn was working to stop any progress on setting up a carbon trading scheme and emissions caps.

    Harlan Watson, President Bush’s chief climate negotiator, rejected any caps on US emissions or participation in carbon trading. “That’s not our agenda,” he said…..

    …away from the cameras, the US delegation to Bonn was scotching any prospect of the emissions caps and carbon trading that are needed to realise the rhetoric. “We don’t believe targets and timetables are important, or a global cap and trade system,” he said. “It’s important not to jeopardise economic growth.” (My emphasis).

9 Trackbacks

  1. [...] the albedo flip that concerns them. Currently, ice at the polar caps reflects sun. If too much of it melts, the [...]

  2. [...] Got Albedo? [...]

  3. By The Dingell Gambit at After Gutenberg on 2007-7-9 at 2:30 pm

    [...] choice to find a way to lessen the incentive to make more dirty money. One could continue to deny the risk to the Planet of anthropogenic emissions, but one would be foolish to invest capital in a project that would loose money because of [...]

  4. [...] Agreed and please hand the revolver to the politician to put to her or his head on board the Titanic, James. What politician in their right pocketbook would enact such a proposal. Everybody endorses it when all that is called for is rhetoric. But if such an incentive were enacted, the Big Money would benefit from it and the constiuents would bear the burden of its enactment and some stump pounder will come along and say look what they did, fiddling with the forces of BAU. [...]

  5. [...] of difference in the fight to stop or slow global warming, if we ignore the coal problem. This is a very valid point that is supported by scientific [...]

  6. [...] the Albedo Flip, Dixon informs: Our release of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases around the planet causes [...]

  7. By After Gutenberg » The Syllogism of Doom on 2007-12-7 at 1:53 pm

    [...] that continue to deny the risk to the Planet of anthropogenic emissions, also recognize that it would be foolish to invest capital in a project that would loose money [...]

  8. [...] identified by there use of the term, “clean coal”, when there is no such thing. BAU-ers fiercely oppose a carbon tax since such policy would create a financial disincentive not only to use cheap coal for power but [...]

  9. [...] identified by there use of the term, “clean coal”, when there is no such thing. BAU-ers fiercely oppose a carbon tax since such policy would create a financial disincentive not only to use cheap coal for power but [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 2469 access attempts in the last 7 days.