Oh, hey, did we say that we would stop doing that?

Satirical image created in Photoshop to illust...

Image via Wikipedia

Speaking of not to worryAndrei relays Carbon Brief results: 9 out of 10 top climate change deniers financially linked to Exxon Mobil.

Of the 938 papers cited, 186 of them were written by only ten men, and foremost among them was Dr Sherwood B Idso, who personally authored 67 of them. Idso is the president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, an ExxonMobil funded think tank. The second most prolific was Dr Patrick J Michaels, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, who receives roughly 40% of his funding from the oil industry.

The title comes from Exxon Mobil saying they would stop funding such efforts. Which, of course, was public relations. The Pollutocracy does what it damn well pleases. (A plutocracy is a political system governed by the wealthy people. Pundits have modified the word to pollutocracy, i.e., when their means to wealth results in harm to the environment, e.g., global devastation, end of Life on the Planet as We know It, ecocide.)

Meanwhile, just after national elections in Canada reflected more conservative status quo, i.e., continued, globally devastating mining of bitumen (oil sands / tar sands / Hillary Sex Wax) in Alberta, there was another leak in the Trans Canada oil pipeline.

The leak began April 29 from a pipeline belonging to Plains Midstream Canada in northern Alberta about seven kilometers (4.3 miles) from the village of Little Beaver. The leakage stopped May 5. The leakage amounted to 28,000 barrels.

Oil spill near the town of Little Beaver in Alberta

“First it was a Michigan river, writes Nathan Vanderklippe for The Globe and Mail. “Then a Chicago suburb. Next was a small stream near an Alberta rancher’s house, followed by a northern Alberta forest.”

Now an oil spill at a North Dakota pipeline pumping station is the latest in a string of incidents over the past year that is heightening public worries about the safety of North America’s vast network of oil pipelines. The series of accidents in the different areas has sent oil gushing from cracked pipes or faulty equipment, oozing into waterways and forested land.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Other Possibly Related AG Posts Automatically Generated

2 Comments

  1. jcwinnie
    Posted 2011-5-19 at 9:28 am | Permalink

    According to HuffPoz Brendan DeMelle, Earth Justice has submitted a complaint, on behalf of the environmental groups, against the U.S. Department of State for blocking attempts to inform the public whether TransCanada and Mr. Elliott attempted to influence Secretary Clinton’s view of a controversial project.

    TransCanada Pipelines [is] the company seeking to build the disastrous Keystone XL pipeline to carry dirty tar sands crude from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries in Texas. Secretary Clinton’s State Department is mulling whether to grant a thumbs up or down to TransCanada’s request for a presidential permit to build and operate the 1,959-mile tar sands pipeline.

    Elliott was the national deputy director of Hillary Clinton’s presidential run, assisting her efforts to win support of delegates and strengthening her ties with influential Democratic governors to win endorsements.

    In his current role as a registered lobbyist for TransCanada, Elliott would obviously be in a good position to reach out to Secretary Clinton’s office to lobby for the Keystone XL pipeline.

    The State Department stymied extensive efforts by the Friends of the Earth, Corporate Ethics International, and the Center for International Environmental Law to seek information via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) about contacts between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Paul Elliott.

    Many environmental groups called on Clinton to recuse herself from the Keystone XL pipeline decision, noting that her tentative nod of approval was extremely premature. The State Department had not yet completed its mandated environmental impact statement, nor reviewed the huge numbers of public comments about the merits and demerits of the Keystone XL project.

    So how had Secretary Clinton reached her inclination to approve the pipeline without waiting on the due diligence of her State Department staff?

    Whether or not Elliott did contact Secretary Clinton or her staff remains to be seen, largely because the State Department rejected the groups’ December 2010 FOIA request seeking records of any contacts between Elliott and the State Department. Independent FOIA experts, as well as the environmental groups, contend that the State Department’s denial of the FOIA request was illegitimate.

    While the State Department did accept a subsequent FOIA request from Friends of the Earth in February, it failed to meet the deadline to respond.

    “Why is the State Department refusing to release these communications?,” asked Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth. “This calls into question the agency’s decision to rush the review of the Keystone XL pipeline, despite its massive environmental risks and bipartisan opposition to it.”

  2. jcwinnie
    Posted 2011-5-19 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Also HuffPoz Tom Zeller reported on the green groups suit. Gosh, if you read HuffPo Green, you might think it was news.

2 Trackbacks

  1. By Keystone XL Pipeline – After Gutenberg on 2011-5-24 at 8:57 am

    [...] other recent events, AG readers will understand the concern of landowner’s. The great concern is the global [...]

  2. [...] the Pollutocracy has taken over in Canada, and full-scale development of Alberta tar sands and distribution of the product to a U.S. market is fully underway. For example, bad news from Green Car Congress, although at a first glance you [...]

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE