<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sheer Scale and High Density of the Plumes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=10537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537</link>
	<description>Just another pretty face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temperature anomalies for latitudes 64N to 90N - After Gutenberg</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537#comment-22900</link>
		<dc:creator>Temperature anomalies for latitudes 64N to 90N - After Gutenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537#comment-22900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sheer Scale and High Density of the Plumes(jcwinnie.biz) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sheer Scale and High Density of the Plumes(jcwinnie.biz) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcwinnie</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537#comment-22860</link>
		<dc:creator>jcwinnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537#comment-22860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://chimalaya.org/2012/01/07/much-ado-about-methane/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Much Ado about Methane&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://chimalaya.org/2012/01/07/much-ado-about-methane/" rel="nofollow nofollow">Much Ado about Methane</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcwinnie</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537#comment-22789</link>
		<dc:creator>jcwinnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10537#comment-22789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a couple of posts last week -- &lt;a href=&quot;/climate-change/2011-12-05-the-brutal-logic-of-climate-change&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/climate-policy/2011-12-08-the-brutal-logic-of-climate-change-mitigation&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; -- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.grist.org/climate-change/2011-12-16-brutal-logic-and-climate-communications&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;David Roberts&lt;/a&gt; &quot;laid out the brutal logic implied by the latest climate science.&quot; 

He then gave credit to scientist &lt;a href=&quot;http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1934/20.full.pdf+html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Kevin Anderson&lt;/a&gt; for stripping away the rosy assumptions hiding in many of today&#039;s common climate scenarios. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;To sum up: a rise in temperature of 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) will be extremely dangerous; a rise of 4 degrees C (7.2 degrees F) or higher could threaten civilization; the only way to avoid 2 degrees C -- or even  4 degrees C -- is a massive crash program that will likely involve, for the rich, industrialized countries of the world, peaking emissions in 2015 and declining them 10 percent year-on-year after that. Alarming!&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a couple of posts last week &#8212; <a href="/climate-change/2011-12-05-the-brutal-logic-of-climate-change" rel="nofollow nofollow">here</a> and <a href="/climate-policy/2011-12-08-the-brutal-logic-of-climate-change-mitigation" rel="nofollow nofollow">here</a> &#8212; <a href="http://www.grist.org/climate-change/2011-12-16-brutal-logic-and-climate-communications" rel="nofollow nofollow">David Roberts</a> &#8220;laid out the brutal logic implied by the latest climate science.&#8221; </p>
<p>He then gave credit to scientist <a href="http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1934/20.full.pdf+html" rel="nofollow nofollow">Kevin Anderson</a> for stripping away the rosy assumptions hiding in many of today&#8217;s common climate scenarios. </p>
<blockquote><p>To sum up: a rise in temperature of 2 degrees C (3.6 degrees F) will be extremely dangerous; a rise of 4 degrees C (7.2 degrees F) or higher could threaten civilization; the only way to avoid 2 degrees C &#8212; or even  4 degrees C &#8212; is a massive crash program that will likely involve, for the rich, industrialized countries of the world, peaking emissions in 2015 and declining them 10 percent year-on-year after that. Alarming!</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: jcwinnie.biz @ 2013-05-21 20:28:29 by W3 Total Cache -->