<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, hey, did we say that we would stop doing that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=10089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089</link>
	<description>Just another pretty face</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shell &#8211; Chevron &#8211; Marathon, Game Over &#8211; After Gutenberg</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22729</link>
		<dc:creator>Shell &#8211; Chevron &#8211; Marathon, Game Over &#8211; After Gutenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 17:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the Pollutocracy has taken over in Canada, and full-scale development of Alberta tar sands and distribution of the product to a U.S. market is fully underway. For example, bad news from Green Car Congress, although at a first glance you [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Pollutocracy has taken over in Canada, and full-scale development of Alberta tar sands and distribution of the product to a U.S. market is fully underway. For example, bad news from Green Car Congress, although at a first glance you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keystone XL Pipeline &#8211; After Gutenberg</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22701</link>
		<dc:creator>Keystone XL Pipeline &#8211; After Gutenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 12:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] other recent events, AG readers will understand the concern of landowner&#8217;s. The great concern is the global [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other recent events, AG readers will understand the concern of landowner&#8217;s. The great concern is the global [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcwinnie</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22700</link>
		<dc:creator>jcwinnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 13:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/18/keystone-xl-environmental-groups-sue-hillary-clinton_n_863925.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HuffPoz Tom Zeller reported&lt;/a&gt; on the green groups suit. Gosh, if you read HuffPo Green, you might think it was news.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/18/keystone-xl-environmental-groups-sue-hillary-clinton_n_863925.html" rel="nofollow nofollow">HuffPoz Tom Zeller reported</a> on the green groups suit. Gosh, if you read HuffPo Green, you might think it was news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jcwinnie</title>
		<link>http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22699</link>
		<dc:creator>jcwinnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcwinnie.biz/wordpress/?p=10089#comment-22699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/hillary-clinton-sued_b_863864.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HuffPoz Brendan DeMelle&lt;/a&gt;, Earth Justice has submitted a complaint, on behalf of the environmental groups, against the U.S. Department of State for blocking attempts to inform the public whether TransCanada and Mr. Elliott attempted to influence Secretary Clinton&#039;s view of a controversial project. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;TransCanada Pipelines [is] the company seeking to build the disastrous Keystone XL pipeline to carry dirty tar sands crude from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries in Texas. Secretary Clinton&#039;s State Department is mulling whether to grant a thumbs up or down to TransCanada&#039;s request for a presidential permit to build and operate the 1,959-mile tar sands pipeline.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Elliott was the national deputy director of Hillary Clinton&#039;s presidential run, assisting her efforts to win support of delegates and strengthening her ties with influential Democratic governors to win endorsements. 

In his current role as a registered lobbyist for TransCanada, Elliott would obviously be in a good position to reach out to Secretary Clinton&#039;s office to lobby for the Keystone XL pipeline.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
The State Department &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foe.org/groups-question-role-oil-lobbyist-state-departments-review-tar-sands-oil-pipeline&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stymied extensive efforts&lt;/a&gt; by the Friends of the Earth, Corporate Ethics International, and the Center for International Environmental Law to seek information via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) about contacts between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Paul Elliott.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Many environmental groups called on Clinton to recuse herself from the Keystone XL pipeline decision, noting that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/10/149542.htm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;her tentative nod of approval&lt;/a&gt; was extremely premature. The State Department had not yet completed its mandated environmental impact statement, nor reviewed the huge numbers of public comments about the merits and demerits of the Keystone XL project. 

So how had Secretary Clinton reached her inclination to approve the pipeline without waiting on the due diligence of her State Department staff? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether or not Elliott did contact Secretary Clinton or her staff remains to be seen, largely because the State Department &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.desmogblog.com/state-department-refuses-release-information-tar-sands-oil-pipeline&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rejected the groups&#039; December 2010 FOIA request&lt;/a&gt; seeking records of any contacts between Elliott and the State Department. Independent FOIA experts, as well as the environmental groups, contend that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/17/idUS96463486420110117?pageNumber=1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;State Department&#039;s denial of the FOIA request was illegitimate&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the State Department did &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foe.org/groups-question-role-oil-lobbyist-state-departments-review-tar-sands-oil-pipeline&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;accept a subsequent FOIA request&lt;/a&gt; from Friends of the Earth in February, it failed to meet the deadline to respond. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;“Why is the State Department refusing to release these communications?,” asked Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth. “This calls into question the agency’s decision to rush the review of the Keystone XL pipeline, despite its massive environmental risks and bipartisan opposition to it.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/brendan-demelle/hillary-clinton-sued_b_863864.html" rel="nofollow nofollow">HuffPoz Brendan DeMelle</a>, Earth Justice has submitted a complaint, on behalf of the environmental groups, against the U.S. Department of State for blocking attempts to inform the public whether TransCanada and Mr. Elliott attempted to influence Secretary Clinton&#8217;s view of a controversial project. </p>
<blockquote><p>TransCanada Pipelines [is] the company seeking to build the disastrous Keystone XL pipeline to carry dirty tar sands crude from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries in Texas. Secretary Clinton&#8217;s State Department is mulling whether to grant a thumbs up or down to TransCanada&#8217;s request for a presidential permit to build and operate the 1,959-mile tar sands pipeline.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Elliott was the national deputy director of Hillary Clinton&#8217;s presidential run, assisting her efforts to win support of delegates and strengthening her ties with influential Democratic governors to win endorsements. </p>
<p>In his current role as a registered lobbyist for TransCanada, Elliott would obviously be in a good position to reach out to Secretary Clinton&#8217;s office to lobby for the Keystone XL pipeline.</p></blockquote>
<p>The State Department <a href="http://www.foe.org/groups-question-role-oil-lobbyist-state-departments-review-tar-sands-oil-pipeline" rel="nofollow nofollow">stymied extensive efforts</a> by the Friends of the Earth, Corporate Ethics International, and the Center for International Environmental Law to seek information via the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) about contacts between Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Paul Elliott.</p>
<blockquote><p>Many environmental groups called on Clinton to recuse herself from the Keystone XL pipeline decision, noting that <a href="http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2010/10/149542.htm" target="_blank" rel="nofollow nofollow">her tentative nod of approval</a> was extremely premature. The State Department had not yet completed its mandated environmental impact statement, nor reviewed the huge numbers of public comments about the merits and demerits of the Keystone XL project. </p>
<p>So how had Secretary Clinton reached her inclination to approve the pipeline without waiting on the due diligence of her State Department staff? </p>
<p>Whether or not Elliott did contact Secretary Clinton or her staff remains to be seen, largely because the State Department <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/state-department-refuses-release-information-tar-sands-oil-pipeline" rel="nofollow nofollow">rejected the groups&#8217; December 2010 FOIA request</a> seeking records of any contacts between Elliott and the State Department. Independent FOIA experts, as well as the environmental groups, contend that the <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/01/17/idUS96463486420110117?pageNumber=1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow nofollow">State Department&#8217;s denial of the FOIA request was illegitimate</a>. </p>
<p>While the State Department did <a href="http://www.foe.org/groups-question-role-oil-lobbyist-state-departments-review-tar-sands-oil-pipeline" target="_blank" rel="nofollow nofollow">accept a subsequent FOIA request</a> from Friends of the Earth in February, it failed to meet the deadline to respond. </p>
<p>“Why is the State Department refusing to release these communications?,” asked Erich Pica, president of Friends of the Earth. “This calls into question the agency’s decision to rush the review of the Keystone XL pipeline, despite its massive environmental risks and bipartisan opposition to it.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Served from: jcwinnie.biz @ 2013-05-20 13:43:32 by W3 Total Cache -->